Pleasantly Plump In Paris

This post is inspired by a twitter follower, who in response to me lamenting at yet another photographic essay of a skinny French woman being photographed lounging naked in an apartment somewhere on the snooty bank of Paris tweeted back at me about being pleasantly plump in Paris.

Her exact twitter words of wisdom were:

Living fat or at least pleasantly plump in Paris would suggest a far more exciting and fulfilling life. The boulangeries! des pâtisseries! les fromages! le vin! THAT'S the kind of living in Paris you should start with.

I've lived in Paris. In 2008. I once went for a weekend to meet a man I met through Facebook intending just to pop over for the weekend and stayed with him for three months. Most of that time was spent fucking and eating. It was a lesson in learning not to order diet coke after 9pm, trying not to look offended when the only English spoken to you all night was by a woman asking " You both look tired, have you been fucking?", absolutely trying not to look offended when the sales assistant looked you up and down and insisted that you needed a bigger size ( to be fair, she was right) and trying not to look disappointed when showing up to parties and the only thing on the table were flutes of champagne, a big bowl of strawberries and a bowl of Ferrero Rocher knowing you could not shove your hand in that bowl in case eating too much chocolate prompted speculation about my mental well being. I still spend a disproportionate amount of time flitting there and having flings with French men, my point is, I've spent enough time in Paris to know (I've seen them with my own les yeux) that French women do indeed get fat, pleasantly plump, have muffin tops and that is totes cool that their bodies come in all glorious shapes and sizes.

Of course, you would not know this if you were to look at photographic essays coming out of France these days. For some reason, unbeknownst to me, photographing skinny French women in Paris gives the photographs a certain amount of ... Je ne sais pas quoi ... bullshit authenticity. An edge, that renders them worthy of being celebrated for the mere fact they feature skinny women with all their ribs on display. Regardless as to whether the photographs are actually any good or not, if they work as a single image or as a connected narrative, or they have something to say other than here is my skinny french friend walking around her left bank apartment. What strikes me about these photographs, is that most of them are remarkably unremarkable, black and white photographs with a hint of grain to convince you it was shot on film because that in itself is meant to be somewhat cooler and arty in the age of the digital photograph (like the skinny French woman who is way cooler than you are). Photographs with the colour slightly desaturated and muted with the right amount of contrast, someone's arse poking out next to a flower as a not so subtle comment or play on female sexuality. The only thing that makes them remarkable is the allure and romanticism that we all have with Paris. It's like we are viewing these images through a Paris filter that serves only to feed our cult-like obsession with the skinny French woman. Knowing these photographs are shot in Paris renders them more artistic so much so that we overlook the obvious that this is yet another photographic essay of a nude skinny French woman lying on a bed, the lack of originality is glaring but the Paris filter renders it invisible. So much so that apparently what is served up a diversity amongst french women in a photographic essay these days is, oh they are different ages. Some are in their twenties, some are in their forties.

So, where are all the photographic essays of the Beguiling pleasantly plump in Paris? I would dearly love to know.

By French photographer and film maker, Sonia Sieff. The photo series  Les Françaises,

By French photographer and film maker, Sonia Sieff. The photo series Les Françaises,

By Mary McCartney for her new book, Paris Nude

By Mary McCartney for her new book, Paris Nude

If you enjoy my writings about photography, then please support my doctoral research in photography

Could not sleep so I ranted about Instagram at 2 am ...

I am not a fan of Instagram. Of all the social media platforms I find this visual based platform a cesspit of bad photography (digital technology has done nothing to improve peoples understanding of basic photographic principles whether this matters or not is an entirely different conversation), faux happiness, constructed falsehoods and visual bollocks. Instagram is designed to suck you in with the nostalgic pull of the Polaroid and the square format image, dazzle you with soft hues and film inspired grain and get you to stay as a pervert voyeur with a never abating desire to see more. I hate it. I use it because I must. My feeds always seem directionless to me as I am sure it does to you, and my Instagrams certainly don’t feel like me. Hash tagging images with key words from the wedding industry is a key marketing tool for not starving as a photographer and I have muttered before that I could post a photo of a used condom nailed to a wall, hashtag it with wedding industry tags and I’d get likes. I’m willing to accept that challenge. It’s all bollocks of course, Instagram is all about socially acceptable voyeurism, it’s the digital equivalent of giving us a peak into what people would have you believe, is life as they know it, or slices of the life the want you to think they have. Instagram has become reverential, we are all praying to the false visual gods

It was Princess Dianna who once quipped that "Well, there were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded” That’s they way it is for him and I. It’s me, him and his wife’s Instagram account. I can’t remember the exact moment that I realised she was following my Instagram account, but it was about the time I decided to perv on my followers’ feeds, I scrolled through hers and there he was. I must admit, I was instantly more smitten. There are many reasons as to why she may be following me; we all loiter about Nappy Valley, go to the same pubs and restaurants, at one point I lived at the bottom end of typically South West London street and he lived at the top end of the same street. When I moved to Clapham Old Town, he’d pop in weekly because I was close to work. She may follow me because she likes my photographs, our world is inter-connective and networked these days. Him, even by stealth looking at my various feeds may have prompted her Instagram to suggest me, although my two Instagram accounts are somewhat different in tone and purpose. I suspect its because our devices cross paths for a few hours a week.

So now I have become the voyeur, the pervert with a surveillant gaze and I am transfixed. It goes beyond the fact that I like him, and I enjoy his body. He is one of these rare men who know how to fuck. He has all the qualities that makes a man perfectly fuckable. He’d make an ideal husband. He is someone’s ideal husband. I can see that now whereas before, I just assumed. Do I want to see what I am looking at? Not really. Is it healthy to look? No bloody way, but there we have it. Snippets of their life for all to see. On a public account. This got me to thinking about how we see what we want to see in other people’s Instagram feeds, that’s their Instagram account is a mirror that reflects our own insecurities and desires. Am I viewing it with envy or pity? Is her Instagram feed really slices of her life, or the life I imagine she has or the life she wants? Of course, I view her feed through the jaded lens of her husband’s infidelity and the woefully naïve misguided assumption that I make, and that is that he cheats because he is unhappily married or we fuck well because he likes me. We view other people’s photographs through our own biased lens of experience, moral decay, needs, wants and unfilled desires. A photograph is not to be used to authenticate truth nor is a photograph reality. Instagram is popular because it feeds a visual neurosis that we all have – to seek validation through the photographs of others. To be perverts, to look unseen. To insert yourselves into the visual narrative of others.

This insertion in the visual narratives of others explains why I don’t really like Instagram. I part take in it because its now an evil I must use to make money. I don’t like looking at myself, I have so many versions of myself that are at times I feel like they are all unworthy of being seen. Every day I wake up and struggle with this research doctorate, even though I was exemplary in my capabilities to be accepted in the first place, in fact my research was labelled exemplary intellectually and conceptual. To post my life via photographs on Instagram, Facebook or even Twitter would be allowing others to look at a life I hide from myself even though photographs and photography are my life. I also sloth around with remnants of a complex and deep-rooted eating disorder that saw me flux from anorexic to bulimic to obese. The chore of choosing a photo would be to much of a head fuck, academically speaking. I am grateful I am Generation X and the evolution of my distorted eating happened prior to the digitally networked world of the photograph. Sure, we had magazines, but you’d have to wait for those magazines to come out monthly.

My eating disorder evolved in an age where if you wanted to learn about being an anorexic then you need to buy books. There were no visual cues on hand, no Instagram with a billion and one photos to gaze at from a computer screen, there were no computers and there was no scapegoat either. No blaming Photoshop or Instagram for me having an eating disorder, that’s too much of a piss weak middle-class feminist sell out. There were no pointless and privileged actresses trying to win faux social media popularity contests about who is the most feminist angry at Photoshop and seeking it to be criminalised and punished with the death penalty (sarcasm). Eating disorders are more complex and at the same time, impossibly simple. My father died with I was two, you join the dots, I felt abandoned and robbed, and it my two-year-old mind I rationalised it must have been me, why was I not good enough to have a father. Going completely off topic, my first memories are of his funeral and there is the reason why I did so much coke, to erase the memory. I have photos of his funeral, I look at the photos of the car crash that killed him. I wish I could erase the funeral memories as easily as hitting the delete button on my Nikon DF. Nonetheless, photos of death are not to be feared, hidden away or treated with pity or shame (another blog post, perhaps), why don't we post photographs of death on Instagram?

Feminists cannot shame photographs nor the women who use photoshop, nor can they criminalise photo-shopped images and at the same time post photos on platforms like Instagram with filters and borders, have you heard of anything more ridiculous than the seeking criminalization of airbrushing? I'll wait for them to ban lighting, posing and the wearing of make up in photographs. Photographs do not cause eating disorders; however, the real problem is me spending way too much time looking at this woman’s Instagram feed. The absence of her husband on her feed could be because he hates having his photo taken or because their marriage is shit, or he hates Instagram as much as I do. He has said this to me before. He has said many things to me that he says he hates, like pompous middle-classness that comes with living in Nappy Valley and the need for endless red sole shoes, the very Louboutin’s that I can see on her Instagram feed. I see many photos of their child on her feed and I ask myself is she setting this kid up to be a future influencer ? Why else would she pimp out photos of her child on a public feed hash-tagged with all the right tags but there I go again, looking through my own moralistic lens because I don’t post photos of my child because those photos do not belong to me, they are my child’s childhood photo-moir and there is another advantage of being Generation X ( and another blog post) my mother not releasing private intimate family photos because she wanted to feel some odd connection with strangers through likes and comments. I don’t understand the sharing of photographs of children online but then again, I managed a sex offender register.

My critique of Instagram is not that it’s vain, vacuous and narcissistic. They are labels too easily lobbed at millennial women for the daring audacity of constructing visual identities online, it’s lazy, slightly misogynistic and bowing down to the patriarchal notions of the ideal image of a woman and nothing more than a cowardly way to silence women online. My critique of Instagram is the way that we view it, at best all our pathological fears and self-loathing are reflected back to us through a lens of our own experiences, belief structure and morals regardless how flexible your moral fiber may be and at worst it feed a visual neuroses that lurks in all of us, the overwhelming desire to perv into the lives of others.

If you enjoy my photographic writing and rantings, then please support my doctoral research …

Support My Doctoral Research

Going Ons ....

Just a quick up date to let you all know what I am working on:

  1. I survived the first 12 months of my PhD - winning already!

  2. Working on a book chapter to be published in 2020 with a European publisher on feminism and photography.

  3. Working on a book to be published with a European publisher on a date to be advised.

  4. Working on version two of the Whoretography Magazine

  5. Organising and Partaking in an artist saloon as part of a central London exhibition in March - details to follow

  6. Also out in March is a article in a new art journal called Hyphen, the article is about visibility, connectivity and men who buy sex.

  7. Getting back to self publishing my own works not only from the Masters Degree but new works on surveillance and men who pay for sex.

  8. and yes, totes forgot! Changed the name and direction of this website.

  9. Also turned Instagram into an art space.

Will keep you all updated on a regular basis.

please Support My doctoral research

The Photographic Theorist ...

So, if you have been following my website for the last few years, you will start to notice some changes in the coming months, I will still be working on Whoretography, the focal point of my PhD but have decided to expand the website to include discussions about photography and photographic theory that fall out of the realm of my PhD studies. I should be clear, this is not going to be a website that teaches you how to be a photographer, give you advice on what camera to use or practice tips to make you a better weekend or professional photographer, it's about the photo and of course film theory that underpins everyday photography that shapes our daily lives. The why behind photography. It will involve discussion about the histories of various genres of photography, critique of photographic practices, discussions about photo-shop, wedding photography, the authenticity of the selfie, the image defined and so much more and really has been borne out of my life photographic that began as a two year old and knowing my father through photographs and not memories. There is a new title, The Photographic Theorist, and that my friends in me. There is a new website , the old website address still works but will be phased out and the website will eventually be published in English and French. My 12 year old nephew asked what I was going to be a Doctor in and I said photography, so he responded with you will be a photographist and that ladies and gents is the best description ever of what being a subject matter expert in photography is called.

If you have any questions, then please use the contacts page to get in touch.

support my doctoral research